Este tube desenvolvido para suas dúvidas , reclamações ou enviar elogios. Rakoff suggested that Meyer may have prosecuted only Kalanick to prevent a clause in his person agreement demanding that disputes with San Francisco-centered Uber be arbitrated. If he were to encourage an injunction against Kalanick, Rakoff also mentioned failing to incorporate Uber as a defendant can bar the organization from contesting liability in other lawsuits.
Meyer charged Kalanick of conspiring with Uber people to organize high spike pricing deals during intervals of heavy desire, by accepting to charge rates fixed by an algorithm inside the Uber application for hailing trips. The lawsuit sought class-action rank for Uber people nationwide who've employed the app, plus a subclass of guests afflicted by spike pricing. Two-weeks before, Rakoff ordered Uber to turn files to assist him ascertain whether it taught a personal researcher to lie-in order to locate information about Meyer over.
Rakoff suggested that Meyer may have prosecuted Kalanick to avoid an offer in his user agreement requesting that disputes with San Francisco-based Uber be arbitrated. If he were to enforce an injunction against Kalanick Rakoff also explained a failure to include uber being a defendant can bar the organization from contesting antitrust liability in different lawsuits.